Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Lindsey Graham’s Stupid Argument › Reply To: Lindsey Graham’s Stupid Argument
RE
Thanks for the gratuitous dig, really showcases the middos necessary to call yourself Reb.
But I digress.
Be still my fluttering heart!!!!
EVEN mich McConnell agrees that there was no votes fraud.
Wow! And mr voter fraud expert McConnell did exactly how much investigating to come to his conclusion??
When exactly did he do this extensive investigation?
Or do you mean to say
McConnell says I don’t want to think about the possibility of votes fraud and it’s massive ramifications so I’ll just say there was none and fools like Reb Eliezer will take my word as gold.
You know there is a public speaker named rabbi Orlofsky,
He has a piece on atheism
A guy tells him he is an atheist. So he asks him if he read any philosophy works, when the guy tells him no, he responds,
So your not an atheist. Your an idiot. You sat in back of the bus one day and said, is there a God?, yes, no, no, yes,? I’ll go with no.
McConnell said there was no fraud.
Almost 180MILLION VOTES were officially cast and your telling me there was NO fraud????
Really???
Oh so you don’t mean NO fraud, you mean not enough fraud to sway the election.
Oh so then you are already agreeing there was fraud. So How exactly do you know how much fraud took place without investigating.
Don’t tell me statistically it wouldn’t be enough, because statistical based on all signs before the election it was going to be a trump landslide.
So basically your just taking McConnells word for it which he made based on absolutely nothing.
Your call
I’m not so gullible.
AND EVEN IF YOU WERE TO BE CORRECT!!
it’s irrelevant.
The point is the rioters believed it. So they were in their constitutionally allowed rights to do what they did.
You want to prove them wrong?
Maybe your side should have done l little bit of that before it boiled over, instead of shutting down trump and not allowing him his day in court to actually judge what evidence he claimed to have.
It’s possible to find evidence of fraud in a min, if your lucky or it’s widespread enough. To conclusively claim there was non requires exhaustive investigation.
The liberal left was claiming almost instantaneously, that there was no evidence of fraud.
That’s a claim that is false automatically due to its timing.
How about you actually think for yourself instead of just swallowing what some politician or news reporter tells you