Ubiq -“The court does. The court doesn’t rule on theoretical cases neither on issues that have not materialized (ripeness) nor on things that already happened, and cant be undone (mootness) in Both of these situations, the court does not issue a judgment. Instead the case is dismissed”
““provided it does not fall within one of the recognized exceptions””
“Lol! I told you (months ago) that it did. you called me a liar. You only YESTERDAY said that. Way back on 12/20 you said ““Then that will be the first time in history – that SCOTUS accepted a petition, but didn’t have a Court case afterwards””
I told you then (and many times since) there would be no court case, you called me a liar.”
I tried to dumb it down that a first grader would understand, but obviously that’s not good enough for You!
Yes, they have to read the case or motion to see if there is any exceptions in the case.
This is called having a Court Case.
They haven’t done that yet.
When they do and if there isn’t any exceptions in it, then they can issue a judgment.
This judgment can be something called moot or something else!
You’re confusing the term moot in laymen’s terms with Legal terms.
It’s not an automatic definition – “it’s Moot”.
You should become a DemonCrat Politician, because they Impeach Presidents on PC terms!
I already posted in different Topics, that what Trump did or said, didn’t qualify to be Unconstitutional or Illegal!
That’s the problem with DemonCrats – they practice PC law.
(That’s why almost no one was prosecuted, Fully, during the Left Libs Riots, all last year!)
But I got news for them – we already have laws and the Constitution – there is a process to change them & it’s Not on their Whim!