Reply To: Re: Election Fraud, How would we know?

Wait… it’s haughtiness to AGREE with a state (commonwealth) supreme court and every other court up and down the federal and state court systems, including the US Supreme Court that already refused to hear this case when brought on an earlier appeal? Haughtiness is to say, “I know better than all these courts.” I don’t know better than all these courts. They’re all correct. They looked at the factual and legal arguments in detail. They all agree with each other. Trump-appointed judges, several of them (when the case was heard in federal court).

And I’ll give you another lecture about laches. In Georgia in 2018, Democrats went to court to get the voter rolls un-purged and to mandate paper backups for the computer voting machines two months BEFORE the election. The judge (US District Judge Amy Totenberg) said that she agreed with the argument, and it was right, but it was TOO LATE to bring the argument. There wasn’t time to change the system or the ballots. LACHES. And Democrats lost the governor’s election in 2018.

Did Kelly take his seat in Congress? If so, he disagreed with his own argument. By his reasoning, his election was also fraudulent and he should step aside until the US Supreme Court rules.

Of course, Kelly’s case is moot for this election. If the Supreme Court even hears his case, it would only apply to future elections.

If you read Kelly’s petition (it’s public record, easy to find) you see that he doesn’t allege that a single vote was improperly cast or that any vote was ineligible. Just that he didn’t agree with the system of voting (the same system that gave him the seat he occupies and refuses to leave).