Reply To: Is hydroxychloroquine really proven ineffective??

Yserbius
I could not find the first two studies you mentioned. The 3 is a study comparing HCQ w/ azithromycin vs HCQ w/azithromycin w/ zinc performed on hospitalized patients. Totally irrelevant here. You say you don’t believe hydroxychloroquine is being suppressed -how do you explain the media’s inability to point out obvious flaws in the studies discrediting HQC? Why won’t the media give voice to the doctors advocating HQC’s use? They only interview the doctors who present these very obviously flawed studies as irrefutable “proof” HQC is ineffective…(The lone exception that comes to mind is cnn interviewing Dr Harvey Risch where the host repeatedly interrupts the Dr not allowing him to make a point…)
Again the notion that only RCT is acceptable is FALSE! It defies all logic! When doctors have combined to treat thousands and thousands of high risk patients with close to 0 deaths-yes, you can absolutely compare that result to the death rate that is 10x higher among the rest of the population! I will once again point out what Dr Risch says, that nearly HALF of cancer treatments never underwent RCT! How to you explain that yserbius? Fact is hydroxychloroquine has always been considered a very safe drug, and yet many doctors have limited access to this drug due to restrictions many governments have put in place. This is unprecedented.
Qbw, GH
You repeating there is “no miracle cure”…is an irrelevant argument and isn t gonna make you sound smarter…why don’t you try debating with some facts?