Reply To: A Vote for Dems is a vote for ANTIFA

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee A Vote for Dems is a vote for ANTIFA Reply To: A Vote for Dems is a vote for ANTIFA

#1867169
Milhouse
Participant

They say now that the white natinalist disguised themselves as antifa.

Who is this “they”? Nobody but Soros’s paid liars, which I am now convinced include this “jackk” and probably “n0m”, though he may be a volunteer. White nationalists practically don’t exist. They number a few hundred in the whole country, maybe 1000. Whereas antifa are open and everywhere, number at least 10,000, and anyone who pretends not to know who they are is not honest. They are the same people as the Black Bloc who wrecked Seattle, Toronto, and many other cities. They are the same people who have been running rampant in Portland with the open connivance and approval of the mayor, who has ordered the police not to interfere with their criminal sprees while arresting anyone who confronts them.

And “Someone from Monsey”, I have news for you, they are not a new thing. There were antifa groups in the 1930s, and they were the exact same thugs as their successors today. They were the “anti-fascists” who attacked and beat up the fascists in the Battle of Cable Street. The fascists may have got what was coming to them, but they were in the right and their antifa attackers were in the wrong — just as in Charlottesville.

Also anyone who accuses Trump of racism, antisemitism, or of pandering to racists and antisemites, let alone to “white nationalists”, is a deliberate knowing liar, because Trump has never done any such thing These are the same people who pretend that the Charlottesville riot was neo-nazis attacking innocent people, rather than what happened, which was vicious antifa and other anarchist and communist thugs attacking people who had come for a peaceful and lawful rally for a legitimate cause, some of whom happened to also be racists, “white nationalists”, and other undesirable and violent people.

And some of whom anticipated that this might happen, and came ready to defend themselves, which they did with gusto, not only against their attackers but also against those “good people” who came to peacefully support and provide cover for the attackers. We can do those people the courtesy of calling them “good”, even though they were assembled illegally and giving tactical and moral support to vicious thugs, but not if they deny that there were plenty of genuinely good people on the other side, who came to oppose removing the statutes and had nothing to do with the thugs.

Please calm down the name calling and personal attacks.