House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is vowing to protect the whistleblower whose complaint sparked the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.
Pelosi says in an interview aired Sunday on “Face the Nation” that she “will make sure” Trump “does not intimidate” the whistleblower. And she’s pushing back on Trump’s accusations that the process is unfair, saying he “has every opportunity to present his case” and could come before the committee to “speak all the truth that he wants if he wants.”
The comments came after Trump criticized his former ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, by tweet as she was testifying last week — prompting accusations of witness intimidation.
Ohio Republican Rep. Mike Turner said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he found the tweets “unfortunate” but “it’s certainly not witness intimidation.”
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
8 Responses
He or she is an accuser whose “evidence” is the basis of a criminal proceeding. Under the constitution, every accused person is entitled to confront their accusers. Secret testimony not subject to rebuttal or being discredited was banned in 1791. If the Democrats plan to run on a platform of abolishing the Bill of Rights, they will get a humongous backlash.
His name is Eric Ciaramella who is on George Soros’s payroll. He was controlled by disgraced CIA director John Brennan who engineered the whole Russian Collusion hoax. Ciaramella was also working closely with Biden. He was fired from the WH in 2017 when it was discovered that he leaked false information that Trump fired Commie on the direct orders from Kremlin.
The whistleblower, whoever he/she is, wrote a memo based on hearsay, and his/her memo cannot be used in court. On the other hand, the sources he/she quoted are available to testify, some have testified, and some more will testify. Their testimony is admissible, allowable, kosher, whatever. Akuperma clearly does not understand this. The whistleblower provided a roadmap, and it is being followed, to find first-hand witnesses, which is permitted and is exactly what prosecutors throughout the US do every day.
@MosheinGolus
Do you have a mainstream, reputable source for that?
Quayboardwarrior, if you insist then:
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html
Read unearthed email correspondence obtained by FOIA between Ciaramella and George Soros foundation:
https://www.scribd.com/document/421081036/SorosNulandUkraineVisaMemosJune2016
Emails: Open Society Kept Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Updated on George Soros’s Personal Ukraine Activitie:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/17/emails-open-society-kept-alleged-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-updated-on-george-soross-personal-ukraine-activities/
Quayboardwarrior, what do you mean “mainstream, reputable source “? News sources owned by Amazon, Comcast, AT&T, Mexican Arab billionaires or “news” sources like ABC that punish whistle-blowers to protect their cover-up of news suppression?
I ask for reputable and you give me… Breitbart.
Quayboardwarrior, i gave you various sources, including Breitbart that is 100% more credible that any of your Fake News Media. If by “reputable” you mean CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, WAPO, NYT then you are more hopeless case that i thought and it is a waste of time talking to you. You are either stupid or intellectually dishonest.