Iran’s Foreign Ministry on Sunday criticized the Egyptian military’s toppling of the nation’s Islamist president, calling the move improper in its first official reaction.
“We do not consider proper the intervention by military forces in politics to replace a democratically elected administration,” said ministry spokesman Abbas Araghchi, according to the official news agency IRNA.
Egypt’s military ousted Mohammed Morsi Wednesday after four days of mass protests against him.
Araghchi said that supporters of Morsi should not give up their efforts to reinstate him. Elections and not “the streets” should decide who is president of Egypt, he said.
“Islamists and revolutionaries should not be frustrated,” Araghchi said.
On the other hand, he said, “We do not see the recent events in Egypt as a defeat for Islamic awakening.”
Iran has considered uprisings in Arab countries as an “Islamic awakening,” repeating its own 1979 Islamic revolution that ousted the pro-Western monarchy and brought Islamists to power.
The exception to Iranian support for the uprisings is Syria, where mostly Sunni rebels are fighting to topple President Bashar Assad, who belongs to an offshoot of Shiite Islam. As the region’s Shiite leader, Iran is Assad’s chief ally.
Egypt has sided with most other Arab states to support Syrian rebels seeking to overthrow Assad.
Morsi established warmer relations with Iran, ending decades of diplomatic estrangement that began in 1979, when Egypt offered refuge to Iran’s deposed ruler after the Islamic revolution.
Ties further deteriorated after Egypt signed a peace treaty with Israel the same year. Iran and Israel remain bitter enemies.
(AP)
3 Responses
now there’s an opinion worth taking seriously!
What’s the difference between a unelected military body overriding a elected government, and a unelected supreme council doing the same?
Since when did Iran ever do anything that could be construed as proper?