UBIQ
your looking (you keep asking) in which case does the victim feel worse. im saying that doesnt equate with the perpetrator having done an objectively worse crime. im discussing from the perpetrators position. so yes if its an act whose consequences are limited to monetary then thats how you judge it
whats worse ? ruining a classic art painting? or burning down an old barn of the same value?
they are both the same
2) its bad from a midos perspective (nogea at least for a yid ) and its a violation of personal property rights
3)i dont know the magic number but i dont consider the first 2 of these examples to even be exceptions
the third is no different then calling a molester a rodef so im not sure why even you would consider that an exception
4)he was a king. it was for midos
in din they are the same
5) its a limud מאי חזית דדמא דידך סומק מדמא דחברך