Reply To: A Study in Trolls: Updated

Home Forums Controversial Topics A Study in Trolls: Updated Reply To: A Study in Trolls: Updated

#1733862
ubiquitin
Participant

KY

“Frankly while that sounds like a good opening for an explanation, by itself it falls short.”

Yep, thats why I gave an example using Joseph. It wasn’t lengthy, its quite short. when you have some time read it,
Here is the money quote “Who is right? There is no way to know. NOT because their is a chisaron in language (which as you ve pointed out 1. isnt true, and 2. wouldnt be a chiddush at all. But because there are people with such crazy ideas out there that no matter how extreme he gets, we still couldnt be certain if he was being serious or not.”

“Saying “buddy you missed the point sorry have a nice day ” doesn’t sound like someone who is in the explaining mode”
True . you arent in the understanding mode, I wrote an explanation, which I suspect you didnt read, since you thought it a “lengthy expositions on Josef.” I’m just using Joseph as an excellent example of Poe’s law

“I’m sorry if I’m being too hard on you. I don’t mean it personally.”
Lol dont worry I am not taking it personally. you are just getting boring and repeating yourself, which In spite of what might be caimed, I don’t find enjoyable

so having a discussion of:
The quote is about language
no it is about people
No it is about language
No it is about people

Just doesnt sound fun to me
Sorry to let me down

so in sum
The quote is about people, as I explained above, using Joseph as an example
If it is about langauge, then yes it is silly.