Reply To: A Study in Trolls: Updated

Home Forums Controversial Topics A Study in Trolls: Updated Reply To: A Study in Trolls: Updated

#1733562
ubiquitin
Participant

(attempt #2)

KY
“as written, language/self-expression/communication of intent”

In that case, yes it is a silly and uninspired quote.

joseph
“Poe’s Law does NOT apply to someone who sincerely believes in and expresses ”
correct. N o argument there

“Now back to me. …Do you ubiq (or anyone else here) seriously doubt how I’ll vote on the issue?”
Yes! I am 90% sure you would vote to continue womans’ suffrage, but 10% thinks you may be serious. you are the literal personification of Poe’s law I’m almost certain you are parodying these positions (it is hard to believe your illogical “rayos” (see below) are meant to be real) yet some posters (not many) do take you seriously so I’m not 100% sure.
I’m curious how others would vote, So I started a thred for that

“I’d bring as rayos the question of whether you’d consider the millions of people in the 40% of the voting population who opposed woman’s suffrage prior to its becoming the law of the land (in 1920) as all being millions of extremist people”

This is not a raya at all. Can I bring a raya from the fact that millions of Germans in 1940 that Gassing Jews is a great idea. that the policy of exterminating Jews isn’t “extreme” ?

Which brings us to another great internet law, namely Godwin’s law