““pure am haaratzos”: is there pure and impure am haaratzos?”
Yes some times it is adulterated with a bit of lomdus, not in this case.
“because I never encountered “pure” am haaratzus, ”
Wait no longer:
“The Rashba and the Ritvah opine,like the Ramban, that it is permitted to eat human meat.”
That line was pure am haaratzos they do not hold it is permitted to eat human meat.
“I’m waiting for Ubiq to reply. If he doesn’t, then I will.”
I’m not sure what i am supposed to reply to.
Kluger yid addressed a question to me , but It should be addressed to the rebetzin. It is similar to the question I asked 4 times that has yet to be answered
Here it is for the 5th time ” “A goy being meanes an unmarried woman. Are you ok with that too?””
as to your silly last comment , youve lost the train of conversation, let me sort you ut a bit
you said “You mix up d’oraysa (which they hold there is no issur min haTorah) with d’rabbonon. You also mix up the d’rabbonon for a Jew with a goy” No I mixed up no such thing, and no, and no rishon holds eating human meat is “permitted”
We are not discussing if their is a technical issur and whether it is deoryasa or derababon. The question is if it is “ok” You said that as long as there isnt a technical issur then it was automatically ok.
THIs is what we are now discussing, this led me to my question here it is again: “A goy being meanes an unmarried woman. Are you ok with that too?”
while you are at it, you can answer Kluger yid’s question too, specifically is it “ok” “Jew who is meanes a divorced Jewess”?