@lmt
In general i stopped answering you because i find most of what you write is plain stupidity and you’re just here to ignite some fires (I’m not saying you don’t have questions, but they way you write is just wrong, and dont deserve an answer even if you wanted one – which you dont)
But i feel that for this i should reply.
All of the sudden you see there is such a concept so all you could say is we dont hold of him?
there was an argument for quite a while on a number of threads that had this question and finally you get an answer so you switch tactics/subjects?
The difference i see between you and @rso is, that @rso at least argues with the concept at hand, if its relevant or not, you on the other hand give me the impression of stam an am haaretz that argues on random things that have nothing to do with the argument but rather just to ignite a fire.
I know you or someone else will say something “smart” similar to the things you said before but that’s ok most people that never learned say the same thing during such an argument.
Same thing regarding “haters” that you guys dont like us calling you.
during an argument you can say certain things but if your arguing on one thing and someone brings in a total different subject together with mocking at the same time, THATS called a “hater”!