Reply To: Can golus end but the geulah still did not arrive?

Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Can golus end but the geulah still did not arrive? › Reply To: Can golus end but the geulah still did not arrive?

March 8, 2019 3:21 pm at 3:21 pm #1691694
Rebbitzen Goldenpickanicerscreenname
Blocked

DY – “He doesn’t quote the Chazon Ish as saying golus is over.”

How can you say that? It’s online!

torahweb dot org slash torah slash 2019 slash parsha slash rsch_pekudei dot html

Here is a cut n paste from this article:

True Redemption
Rav Hershel Schachter

In 1948, when the medinah was first established, the Chazon Ish had already moved to Eretz Yisroel. He is quoted as having said that the establishment of the medinah this constitutes the end of the golus but we have not yet arrived at the geulah. Some thought that this statement was mere double-talk. I think the Chazon Ish was using the terminology of the Ramban in his introduction to Chumash Shemos.