2cents: Your claim that those that gave the MMR vaccine were healthy, yet those that did not receive it were not healthy, has the following problems.
a. not in line with your position, that autism is genetic and actually has SIGNS (your style of writing) of autism earlier on.
b. Unsubstantiated and not reality, people that withhold vaccinations do it only after they know their child has autism and buy into the false notion that is to blame for this, as they gave their child the MMR vaccine.
c. Their siblings are unlikely to receive ANY vaccines, yet they are more likely to be diagnosed with autism.
I am typing S L O W L Y so maybe you will be able to understand. Maybe.
Autism has BOTH genetic and environmental (vaccines) factors.
If a child with a genetic weakness is vaccinated they get Autism.
If the child with the genetic weakness is NOT vaccinated, most likely will NOT get Autism.
The older sibling was Vaccinated and got Autism. Doctor denies that it was caused by Vaccines.
Parents vaccinate younger sibling – and younger sibling shows SIGNS OF AUTISM.
Parents STOP Vaccinating the younger sibling – doesn’t get MMR.
But the younger sibling’s Autism was caused by EARLIER Vaccines. Before birth, at birth 2 mo, 4 mo, 6 mo.
The younger sibling is NOT “unvaccinated” but PARTIALLY Vaccinated.
You claim that younger siblings did not receive ANY vaccines and got Autism (d).
NOWHERE in the study does it say that the Younger Siblings did not get ANY Vaccines!
It only states that the younger siblings did not get MMR.
So YOUR whole theory falls FLAT – it is based on a WRONG Assumption!