Dooms,
“Which means that MMR RAISED the Autism Rate to Equal that of a Group that had a high percentage of Children who already showed SIGNS OF AUTISM!”
Not sure how you arrive at this conclusion. First off, it groups children that were not vaccinated, and their siblings were diagnosed with autism.
Explain how this group is divided based on ‘healthy user bias’, the selection has nothing to do with calling being diagnosed with autism or with the MMR.
Another group is selected based on having the MMR, yet these children do not have siblings that were diagnosed with autism.
Now in a simplistic fashion, explain how come the group that had no siblings with autism actually had a lower rate of autism than those that were not vaccinated, yet had a sibling with autism.
In the past, you made a bold claim that autism has nothing to do with genetics, so explain how come the group that did not vaccinate, only because they had a sibling that was diagnosed with autism, actually had a higher rate of autism.
you also refused to acknowledge that adding autism to the DSM in the 1980s actually increased the rate of diagnosed autism a few thousand percents, you also refuse to acknowledge that all the additions to the ASD criteria are clearly associated with increases to ASD diagnosis.
You also selectively did not acknowledge what I wrote about the fact that you now acknowledge that most autistic children actually have signs (or how you wrote it, SIGNS) of the disorder prior to the diagnosis and prior to the receiving the MMR shot, which is why they have withheld the vaccination.
You only came up with this, as this was the only explanation for healthy bias claim you made, you cannot use all the arguments to further your agenda when they actually contradict each other.