“Who is Lying? Doomsday or ProVaxxers?”
doomsday
“Folks, first the ProVaxxers Lied that there are NO studies showing a link between Vaccines and Autism – except for Wakefield. ”
I never said that. (at least I didint mean that, sorry if I wasn’t clear) What I meant was that there is no study linking vaccines, and autism, period. Wakefiel’ds was retracted and no longer counts as a study than can be used to link things.
“Here are the FIRST 10 Studies listed on the site: 157 Studies linking Vaccines to Autism:”
Yep you posted these already y 70% arent about the subject at hand, and the others are weak at best.
1. again this was a preliminary study. The final results WERE published see reference earlier
I proved that ProVaxxers LIED with a google search including a site that listed:
“157 Studies linking Vaccines to Autism”
2. “Ubiquiton, WHY Does CDC refuse to do a LARGE Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study when there IS a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study that shows a Link between Vaccines and Autism???
NO PROVAXXER CAN ANSWER this question!”
I literally answered this question several times.
I’m starting t o think you dont eve rend these short responses much liek you clearly didn’t read the studies (or even the TITLES of the studies you cite)
“The study has validity but a LARGER Study would have GREATER Validity!”
You left off half of my critique of said study
3. Sorry it was published I was wrong on that point.
nonetheless as I pointed out there is a big flaw in that study
4 -7
“A Study showing MERCURY causes Autism”
But that isnt the subject at hand
8
“caused Autism in Rats.” Are you being serious? Autistic rats? (though to be fair I did come across some interesting autistic rat models w/ autistic type features)
” Is Ubiquiton claiming that all the Medicine Safety Studies done by Pharmaceutical Companies using Rats are INVALID???”
No, are you claiming that If I did a study that showed that removing a rat’s larynx did not change its ability to speak (not squeak or squeal) you would accept that “hey I guess larynx doesnt play a role in human speach, go ahead and remove them willy nilly” ?
9. “WRONG! It was a study showing Vaccines cause diagnosis of “Emotional Disturbance” in Boys”
you must be talking about a different study.
Assuming yuo mean Gender-selective toxicity of thimerosal.: Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2009 Mar;61(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
It is in fact about mice (This one is neither about Autism nor vaccines its about thimerosal and toxicity rates in male mice compared to females) )
10. Again, neither about vaccines nor autism.
“So who is lying? I showed you that 9 out of 10 of the first 10 studies from site “157 Studies showing Link between Vaccines and Autism” are showing that Vaccines or Mercury are associated with Autism.”
Ah but thats not what you claimed earlier .Earlier you said vaccines and autism.
To date you have not showed a single study establishing such a link
I’m happy to switch to the admittedly tangentially related, mercury and autism . But one thing at a time.
Are you out of studies trying to link Autism to vaccines?