2Cents: which study are you referring to?
I clearly wrote that the study I am referring to is: “Autism Occurrence by MMR Vaccine Status Among US Children With Older Siblings With and Without Autism”.
2Cents: you wrote:
“The Study found some Children who did not get MMR who have Autism. This is used to PROCLAIM:”
– Incorrect, the study finds no difference between those that received the MMR vaccine and those that have not. This is not the same as “the study found some Children who did not get the MMR who have autism”.
Out of 95,000 records, the “researchers” found TWENTY-THREE Children who 1. Had older sibling with Autism 2. Had NO MMR 3. Had Autism.
These 23 children out of 95,000 were used to proclaim: MMR does NOT cause Autism.
So I am Correct that finding SOME Children with Autism and NO MMR was used as PROOF that
MMR does Not Cause Autism. Which is like saying if Non-Smokers get Cancer, that is PROOF that Smoking
does NOT cause Cancer!
2Cents: The study finds no difference between those that received the MMR vaccine and those that have not.
And I answered that conclusion is FRAUDULENT because it ignored HEALTHY USER BIAS which the Researchers even acknowledged in their study – but then IGNORED!
Healthy User Bias means that children who are Healthy and Normal are more likely to get MMR Vaccine, while children who are SHOWING SIGNS OF AUTISM are more likely NOT to get the MMR Vaccine. That is why SCIENTIFIC Studies it is RANDOM which children get MMR and which do Not! Healthy User Bias HIDES the
MMR Connection – and the Researchers of this Study Acknowledge this! So they KNOWINGLY made a
FRAUDULENT Conclusion!