2cents
“This is where you err, it shows no association at all, your implying that there is an association yet just ‘not in itself” when in fact the study proves that there is no association at all. ”
The evidence is that the Neuro-typical children should’ve been autistic, had MMR been the cause for autism.
Laying out the options:
A. MMR causes autism without needing any other factor
B. MMR causes autism, only when another variable is present.
C. Something else causes Autism.
How does the above evidence rule out optionB?