Health: “I would encourage you to read the last page of this opinion “In this case, I have concluded that petitioners have presented sufficient evidence and testimony to entitle them to compensation in the hen it comes Vaccine Program. I have not concluded that vaccines present a substantial risk of SIDS. In fact, the evidence is to the contrary. “
In Vaccine Court, the Parents are not suing the Vaccine Maker but the US Government is the Plaintiff, AND the US Government is also the Judge! How is that for UNBIASED? (Not!) So of course, the US Judge who wrote the opinion is saying even though the Parents of Dead Babies brought sufficient evidence to Prove that Vaccines caused their babies of deaths (preponderance of evidence), the US government still will not admit that Vaccines causes SIDS because “the evidence is to the contrary”.
How can a Judge say the Parents brought sufficient proof that it is most likely their babies SIDS were caused by vaccines and in the same breath deny that vaccines present a substantial risk of SIDS??? Does anyone notice that the Judge is contradicting himself???
The “evidence” the Judge is referring to that Vaccines don’t cause Healthy babies to die in their sleep (SIDS) are the FAKE studies that the CDC hires. And I have pointed out an example – the Danish Study – of the Fraud committed by the researcher to get a false conclusion.