You are doing what’s called a “Gish Gallop”. Posting dozens of pieces of evidence in order to overwhelm the person you are trying to debate because they will have to go through each one individually. I can respond in kind if you would just Google “124 (now 144) papers that DO NOT prove vaccines cause autism”.
Just reading the titles of the articles I know that the conclusion you are attempting to draw is a false and misleading one. Several articles specifically talk about heavy metal ethylmercury which has never been present in vaccines, unlike methylethyl mercury which is harmless. It’s a lack of scientific knowledge that causes people to confuse and conflate the two.
On another note, several articles are old and only show preliminary conclusions that essentially state “more data required”. More data has been gathered and newer studies were launched that showed the initial preliminary conclusions were incorrect due to a variety of factors.