Truthishidden: you should have kept your comments hidden! You clearly know absolutely nothing about interpreting studies nor about the concept brought out above about spurious correlation. Before you try to selectively cite individual studies, you need to go and learn some basic science. Because someone published a study does not make it valid nor does it mean the conclusions are correct. There are many, many, many more studies about the benefits of vaccination with many more patients than there are studies describing potential problems (on the order of MILLIONS, or probably even BILLIONS more). Furthermore, you keep talking about the adverse experiences in the pharmaceutical companies’ labeling-how come you don’t trust them at all with regard to the excellent studies that they did before licensing their products but trust them implicitly with respect to side effects? What idiocy! Furthermore do you have any idea how the companies’ Product information works? I’ll answer that; No, you don’t. A company is required by FDA to report EVERYTHING that occurred within a period of time after the product (in this case, vaccine) is used with the CLEAR RECOGNITION that this bears NO RELATIONSHIP to causality. That’s why you’ll find that the number 1 “ side effect” listed for all children’s antibiotics is “upper respiratory infection.” Clearly the medicine didn’t CAUSE the cold but the cold happened while the child was taking the medicine and is required by the excellent system the FDA has in place to be reported by the company. But, then again, anyone who’s ignorant enogh to think that the CDC is falsifying data and would rather believe anecdotal unverified reports is clearly someone who doesn’t deserve to participate in any scientific discussion.
Menu