Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › THREAD: Not for Anti-vaxxers › Reply To: THREAD: Not for Anti-vaxxers
Also–to quote from the CDC on how aluminum is safe is akin to asking the fox if it’s okay to leave the henhouse open–the CDC sells 4 billion dollars worth of vaccines each year and is HEAVILY invested in the vaccine program–at any rate, they’re not the ones changing the diapers of the autistic children. Nor are they the ones who have to deal with the plethora of neurological issues plaguing our community. But let’s pull apart the CDC’s deceptive statement:
“Adjuvants have been used safely in vaccines for decades.”
Notice how this statement makes the claim that because they’ve been used for decades, they must be safe. HRT’s were also used for decases, as was DES–both with devastating consequences only found out much later when randomized constrolled trials were done, in the case of HRT’s, and when very strange cancers arose in the case of DES (and by the way, the DES tragedy was discovered by a discerning doctor who happened to ask the right questions, not the FDA).
Next highly deceptive statement:
“In all cases, vaccines containing adjuvants are tested for safety and effectiveness in clinical trials before they are licensed for use in the United States, and they are continuously monitored by CDC and FDA once they are approved.”
Notice that the CDC did not say that “adjuvants” have been tested for safety, only the “vaccines containing adjuvants.” A perfect example of this would be Gardasil–it was tested against a placebo containing the aluminum adjuvant! How then is it possible to find adverse effects of the adjuvant itself?
I recommend that you start looking at some of the recent studies (past ten years) that the CDC doesn’t know what to do about–studies by Schoenfeld, Exley, Shaw, Gherardi, and others.