Republicans and Democrats competed to make immigration an election-year issue on their own terms as the GOP pushed symbolic legislation through the House Wednesday extolling a federal law enforcement agency that some liberals have proposed abolishing.
The measure, which changes no laws, represents a Republican drive to take advantage of an earlier Democratic bill erasing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The GOP resolution approved Wednesday says attempts to eliminate ICE would let “dangerous criminal aliens” stay in the U.S. and “insult” the agency’s officers.
The Democratic bill wiping out the agency had nine sponsors but was shunned by others worried it risked estranging moderate voters. Abolishing ICE has become a rallying cry for the party’s liberal wing, including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and upstart House candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who stunned a 10-term congressman in a New York Democratic primary. Republicans were determined to use that push to cast Democrats as extreme.
“Any other vote than a yes vote is for open borders,” the No. 3 House GOP leader, Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, said of his party’s resolution praising the immigration agency. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said the effort to eliminate ICE was being pushed by “the new socialist Democratic party.”
Democrats said Republicans were trying to distract voters from President Donald Trump, his now-dropped policy of separating migrant children from their parents and his statements challenging the finding that Russia interfered in the 2016 elections.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said the GOP resolution was “a meaningless political stunt to change the subject from the international and domestic shame unleashed on us by President Trump.”
The GOP resolution acclaiming ICE was approved 244-35, with 133 Democrats voting “present” to protest the measure. All but one voting Republican backed the measure along with 18 Democrats, many from competitive districts.
The vote came the same day House Republicans released a spending bill providing $5 billion next year for building Trump’s proposed border wall with Mexico. That would represent a major boost and suggests a raucous pre-election budget battle may lie ahead.
Democrats have long opposed financing Trump’s wall but lack the votes by themselves to block House approval of that amount. But they have the strength to derail legislation in the closely divided Senate. Without naming a figure, Trump said in April that he would “have no choice” but to force a government shutdown this fall if he doesn’t get the border security money he wants.
The $5 billion is well above the $1.6 billion in the Senate version of the bill, which would finance the Homeland Security Department. The higher amount matches what Trump has privately sought in conversations with Republican lawmakers, according to a GOP congressional aide who wasn’t authorized to publicly talk about private discussions and spoke on condition of anonymity.
“Keeping Americans safe by protecting our homeland is a top priority,” Rep. Kevin Yoder, R-Kan., who heads the House Appropriations Committee’s homeland security subcommittee, said in a written statement.
Two leading Democrats — Reps. Nita Lowey of New York and California’s Lucille Roybal-Allard — called the $5 billion a waste that “only further enables this administration’s obsession with cruel attacks on immigrants.”
The government’s new budget year begins Oct. 1, which in effect creates a deadline for the White House and Congress to try reaching budget deals. They almost never do. Without at least a temporary truce, federal agencies would shut down that day. That would create a tremendous political risk for the GOP, which controls government, barely a month before the election.
Trump made the wall a keystone of his successful 2016 election campaign, but insisted that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico has always refused to do so.
Trump tweeted his thanks to Yoder for proposing the $5 billion and wrote that Yoder has “my full and total endorsement.” Yoder is favored to win his GOP primary next month but could face a competitive fall race.
All but $126 million of the $5 billion would be for constructing more than 200 miles of wall, with the remainder for technology. Beyond the $5 billion, the bill includes added money for new canine teams, border patrol agents, aircraft and sensors.
(AP)
Join the official YWN WhatsApp status
One Response
The idea of abolishing ICE as a remedy for the tragedy and travesty happening to refugees at the US southern border is as stupid as the idea to abolish the IRS because some people object to their collection practices or codified tax rates. To paraprase a song that Kate Smith made popular, someone’s got to protect the border, someone’s got to collect the taxes. The way to fix both problems is to fix the laws and regulations, not to get rid of the people charged with enforcing the law.