Search
Close this search box.

Obama Says Refusal To Lift Debt Ceiling Would Hurt Economy


President Barack Obama demanded on Monday that lawmakers raise the nation’s $16.4 trillion federal debt limit quickly, warning that “Social Security benefits and veterans’ checks will be delayed” if they don’t and cautioning Republicans not to insist on concessions in exchange.

“They will not collect a ransom in exchange for not crashing the economy,” he said at the final news conference of his first term. “The full faith and credit of the United States of America is not a bargaining chip. And they better decide quickly because time is running short.”

“We are not a deadbeat nation,” Obama declared, less than a week away from taking the oath of office for a second term.

The president also said he will soon ask Congress to enact new gun legislation in the wake of the shootings a month ago that left 20 elementary students dead in Newtown, Conn. Facing stiff opposition from the National Rifle Association, he conceded lawmakers may not approve everything he asks for.

Among the proposals under consideration are a ban on assault-style weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines. Obama said he would unveil his proposals next week. He was meeting after his news conference with Vice President Joe Biden, his point man in producing gun control measures to present to Congress.

Obama made his remarks as a new Congress was settling in for its own new term, Republicans in control of the House and Democrats in the Senate.

Lawmakers face three distinct deadlines before April 1. The debt limit must be raised to prevent a default, a series of across-the-board spending cuts is to kick in on March 1, and funding for most government programs will run out on March 27.

Obama virtually dared Republicans to let the government shut down rather than renew funding beyond March 27. “It will hurt the economy,” he said emphatically.

The president opened his news conference with a statement by saying that a vote to increase the debt limit “does not authorize more spending. It simply allows the country to pay for spending that Congress has already agreed to. These are bills we’ve already racked up and we need to pay them.”

Jabbing at Republicans, he quoted House Speaker John Boehner’s remarks of two years ago that allowing a default on U.S. obligations — the practical effect of failing to raise the debt limit — would be a disaster.

Obama said he was willing to consider future deficit cuts, but only if they are done independently from a vote to raise the $16.4 trillion debt limit.

In a blunt rebuttal to Republicans who say they will not agree to any more tax increases, the president said taxes and spending both must be on the table.

He said he is “open to making modest adjustments to programs like Medicare to protect them for future generations,” and wants to close tax loopholes at the same time.

Obama spoke less than a week before his inauguration for a second term, and several days after he signed legislation that narrowly averted a “fiscal cliff” of automatic spending cuts and across-the-board tax increases.

Combined with other bills he signed earlier in the term, he said he and Congress have reduced deficits by about $2.5 trillion over a decade, somewhat less than the $4 trillion he said is necessary to get them down to a manageable size.

“I’m happy to have a conversation about how we reduce our deficits in a sensible way,” he said, but added repeatedly he wasn’t willing to let congressional Republicans use the debt limit as leverage in negotiations over spending cuts.

Failure to raise the debt limit would put the United States into a first-ever default, a step that Obama said could “blow up the economy.”

Congressional Democrats have recently urged the president to lift the debt limit unilaterally. He said — as he has before — that he won’t do it, that Congress had voted for the spending that resulted in federal borrowing, and should now agree to pay the bill.

When it came to gun legislation, the president sought to reassure sportsmen and hunters that they have nothing for worry about.

“The issue here is not whether or not we believe in the 2nd Amendment. The issue is whether there are sensible steps we can take so that the individual in Newtown can’t walk into a school and gun down a bunch of children in a shockingly rapid fashion. Certainly we can do something about that,” he said.

Short of legislation, the president said there were administrative actions he could take. Asked to provide an example, he said, “How we are gathering data, for example, on guns that fall into the hands of criminals and how we track that more effectively.”

(AP)



6 Responses

  1. Obama will continue to say that refusing what Obama wants will hurt the economy! until he gets what this cry-baby pres wants-spoiled little child that he is

  2. Social security would be unaffected since it comes from a separate revenue stream.

    Continually increasing the debt limit will be a long term disaster, whereas not increasing it is a short term inconvenience.

    The analogy is to someone who has maxed out all their credit cards but has too many assets to consider bankruptcy. Is it better to offer them larger credit lines and more credit cards – or to tell them to cut spending and start paying off their debts.

  3. All I know is that as of Jan 1st 2013, my paycheck is minus 20 bucks per week! Thats close to 1000 bucks a year, and I have a measly job.

    Obama, where is all the money going????

  4. Obama says you just have to spend money that you do not have and give me what ever I wish that is what the American people want,just spend what you don’t have and tax the rich, it is the falt of the rich that I can’t spent the money

  5. #2 said

    “it is the falt of the rich that I can’t spent the money”

    I think you meant to say “it is the fault of the rich that I can’t spend the money”

  6. #3 (Poster) asked where the money is going.

    Social security (espcially the $1K they nicked starting this month). Medicare and Medicaid. Defense (would you really want our enemies to rule the world?). Law enforcement (would you really want to have to rely on Shomrim, instead of having police). Etc.

    Not to mention all those goodies that the politicians love to remind you they are giving you (just ask the politicians who send in press releases to YWN to remind you how they are spending your money).

    When you start hearing people saying “I really don’t need that program” or “I can afford to pay more taxes” – you’ll know the problem has been solved.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts