Democrats want to know why the Trump administration allowed two Russian spy chiefs under U.S. and European sanctions to meet last week in Washington with American intelligence officials.
Russia’s U.S. ambassador said Sergei Naryshkin, head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, was in the United States to discuss counterterrorism with his American counterparts.
Naryshkin was accompanied at the meeting in Washington by Alexander Bortnikov, who directs the top KGB successor agency known as the Federal Security Service, according to two U.S. officials, who were not authorized to disclose the information and spoke on condition of anonymity.
The two Russian intelligence officials were sanctioned in 2014 in response to Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine — Naryshkin by the U.S. and Bortnikov by the European Union.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said the timing of the meeting is suspicious because it came just days before the Trump administration decided not to issue new sanctions against Russian politicians and oligarchs over Russian interference in the election. He released a letter early Thursday demanding that Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats disclose details of the meeting by Feb. 9.
Schumer said sanctions against Naryshkin impose severe financial penalties and prohibit his entry into the U.S. without a waiver.
The State Department declined to comment, saying visa records are confidential by law.
The CIA would not confirm the meetings, saying only that any interactions with foreign intelligence officials would have been conducted in accordance with U.S. law and in consultation with appropriate departments and agencies. Such meetings might occur more often than is publicly known.
Government agencies at times need to secure waivers to get certain individuals into the country, according to a U.S. official, who agreed to discuss the process only on condition of anonymity. The official said law enforcement agencies, for instance, might need a waiver to allow a witness in an arms trafficking case travel to the United States. Other U.S. agencies might need to speak with officials from an enemy nation.
Schumer wants to know why the visit was allowed, who approved it, which other Russian officials were in the delegation and whether they also are under sanction. Schumer also asked Coats to disclose what was discussed at the meetings and whether the Russians also met with Trump administration officials at the White House, State or Defense departments or the National Security Council.
“Did the U.S. officials who met with Mr. Naryshkin raise Russia’s interference in the 2016 elections? If not, why was this not raised? If raised, what was his response?” Schumer asked.
Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin, the senior Democratic on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, also expressed concern about the meeting. He said the fact that it was disclosed by Russian authorities is evidence that Moscow wants to boast that sanctioned officials can travel into the United States. Cardin said in a CNN interview he wants to make sure sanctions against Russians are being enforced.
(AP)
3 Responses
Something to wonder about a political party, in this case Democrats, that screams against release of a simple memo yet demands the world be informed of counter-terror discussions and intern-national security maters divulged.
Going back to the 2012 debate between Romney and Obama, Obama openly ridiculed (literally ridiculed) Romney for the suggestions that Russia was enemy number 1.
In fact, a hot mic caught Obama telling then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he would have more “space” to negotiate on missile defense after the November presidential election .
Further, a 2015 article in the “foreignpolicy.com” argues vociferously that (despite the sanctions Obama was forced to put on Russia) that Russia is not a significant player and is going down the tubes fast and Romney was soooo wrong in 2012 and Obama soooo right.
It continues that “The Romney today fails to understand that the United States and Russia can work together when they share common interests …”
So are they now saying Romney was right and Obama was wrong?
No.
Get this quote from Obama in 2017:
“I don’t think I underestimated him … I think that I underestimated the degree to which, in this new information age, it is possible for misinformation for cyberhacking and so forth to have an impact on our open societies, our open systems, to insinuate themselves into our democratic practices in ways that I think are accelerating.”
So there is a difference between “him” (Putin) and what he does, and as such Obama is still soooo right and Romney soooo wrong.
President golfer didn’t want anyone to know about his oval office visit with Russians, U.S. media not invited only Russian. If they really had crucial information to share, pick up the phone. Cover up.