Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Mesichists Explained by ChabadShlucha › Reply To: Mesichists Explained by ChabadShlucha
November 29, 2017 11:27 pm at 11:27 pm
#1415749
RSo
Participant
Moshiachat: “The first pshat of Rashi is min hameisim idk why ur saying it’s not. ”
We’ve been through all this before and once again it is being ignored by those who don’t seem to care about CHazal or Rishonim. Rashi explains that the Gemoro means that if Moshiach WAS [note past tense] someone who has already died then it WAS [again past tense] Doniel.
That Rashi does not allow room to say that Moshiach was any dead person other than Doniel. To use it to say, “The GEmoro says it could have been a dead person so I’m saying it was the lubavitcher rebbe” is IMHO close to apikorsus because it is מגלה פנים שלא כהלכה.