Reply To: No mention of the huge techailes event in Boro Park on Chol Hamoed?!

ubiquitin

“What is the full research youve done? attended a few shiurim and read some flyers on Techeilet.com
Because that “resarch” IVe done several times.”

I have done very thorough research and you have not, as is apparent from the constant inaccuracies in your statements. Such as the following statement which you state with a tone if certainty which is totally wrong:
“youdont say,
“This is not a matter of being machmir, only of being mevatel a mitzvah”you must be one of these people: “I believe most people on this tread are not oseik in halacha, ”
Since otherwise you would know that techeiles isnt meakev (Yes I know some hold even today if techeiles is available then it is meakev but to use that as an argument to require questionable techeiles is circular reasoning)”

The fact that techailes isn’t meakev lavan simply means that lavan is a mirtzva independant of techailes so that if a person only has lavan and gtechailes isn’t available, the lavan is still amitzva even in faxce of the lack f techailes. But that doesn’t mean that techailes isn’t a chiyuv gamur, because it most certainly is. It’s like the other halacha mentioned in that mishna תפילה של יד אינה מעכבת את של ראש, which doesn’t mean that the shel rosh isn’t a chiyuv gamur, because it most certsinly is, and a person who has the availablity to wear shel rosh and doesn’t is doing an avaira of being mevatel a mitzva, and the same is true for techailes.

Had you attended the asifa, you would have heard this being explained clearly and thoroughly. So if you profess to have attended some shiurim, while that may be so, your research is totally insufficient. I, on the other hand, have done proper extensive research, and I have come to know that the arguments presented against the techailes are just like the argument I refer to here which you made, totally wrong and based on ignorance and not on knowledge.

By the way, as you admit to not having done much research besides reading some flyers etc, why are you so bold to argue so strongly against the techailes. Do you often engage in the practice of making arguments in subjects in which you aren’t well learned, against people who may very well know far far much more that you, and may actually be experts?