Reply To: No mention of the huge techailes event in Boro Park on Chol Hamoed?!

Home Forums Bais Medrash No mention of the huge techailes event in Boro Park on Chol Hamoed?! Reply To: No mention of the huge techailes event in Boro Park on Chol Hamoed?!

#1384954
ubiquitin
Participant

youdontsay
“OK I will play the game too. ”

Game? I guess Tomdickand harry was referring to you “I think you and others don’t realize the seriousness of this.”
Also, have you realy stooped to I know you are but what am I arguments?
Seriously, what is your agenda, money? is it some messianic view?
Why cant it just be an argument? Rabbi Kaganhoff is a talmid chacham he holds x others hold z. why does it bother you so much to leave it at that? Is this the first machlokes youve encountered?

” it is no raayah what is mentioned in Teshuvos V’Hanhagos, since the Brisker don’t consider him one of them.”
This is the silliest thing youve written. who cares what the Brisker consider, that isnt the point. Yekke is proving to you that R’ Chaim’s idea is used halacha lemaaseh by a posek.

“Pronunciation is mesorah.”

Exactly
A krias Shema is a deoraysa. Yet we follow our MEsora even though there is a chance we arent being yotze the deoraysa.

“mesorah in halacha means a derech in p’sak — how to go about paskning”
Exactly!!! ding ding ding. And Scientific inquiry isnt one of them (nor are manuscripts) (Im not talking about veryfying a metzius BEFORE paskenig a sheila like with technological shaylas)
With Murex it was found primarily based on linguistic/archaeological evidence and then Some halachic sources were forced to fit (some better than others), as yo umay know R’ Herzog wasnt even zoche to see the blue from his discovery.

” Besides, one does not need a mesorah on metzious only on oifes (as the Maharil says we can find techeles). ”
I am not saying my view is universally held