Bart Lorang calls it a “paid, paid vacation.”
The CEO and co-founder of Denver-based software provider company FullContact is offering his employees a $7,500 bonus to go on vacation, on top of their normal vacation pay.
So what’s the catch? There’s three, as Lorang describes in a blog on the company’s website.
First, employees must completely go off the technology grid, meaning no e-mail, texting or phone calls. In conjunction with the first rule, employees are not allowed to do any work while on their trip.
Third, employees must actually go on a trip. Lorang explains he believes all his employees deserve a nice vacation, and he chose the $7,500 dollar amount because he believes it is enough for a family of four to take a trip to Mexico for a week.
“We felt that everyone should have the opportunity to take a nice vacation without constantly worrying about how much money they’re spending while on vacation,” Lorang blogged.
Lorang tells KDVR he had the idea for the incentive when he was browsing photos of his trip to Egypt. He was struck by a photo of himself riding a camel among the pyramids, but he was texting.
He says experiences like this have made him realized the value of completely disconnecting during a trip, and wants to encourage his employees to do so as well.
Some of Lorang’s software engineers that have taken him up on his offer say while it was difficult initially going off the grid, they ended up loving their completely unplugged vacation.
“Absolutely fantastic. I mean you get so used to waking up to emails in the morning,” engineer Kyle Hansen tells KDVR.
4 Responses
I bet you, if frum people were offered such a deal to refrain from texting while davening, they would jump on the proposal
When we refrain from texting/talking/emailing while davening and learning, hashem will pay us much much more than any Employer could pay it’s employees
Hashem blessed the Jewish nation with a “paid, paid vacation” once a week. Get paid in this world and the next.
Given the level of drug violence in Mexico, I think he should have based the amount on the cost of a vacation elsewhere.