Home › Forums › Rants › What would you do? › Reply To: What would you do?
Avram -“This updated guidance seems geared towards encouraging more bystanders, even those untrained, to do something.”
Health: “That’s exactly the point! “Untrained”
It’s beyond me, some of the posts in this topic!”
Health, we tried explaining to you.. In any case, without reexplaining everything again, the bottom line is as follows:
You may have some valid points and you may in fact be giving over valuable information. The problem is that you are doing it by way of bashing someone else (the writers and editors of the newspaper quoted).
You are assuming that their shitah must be wrong and yours must be right even though you have not given any proofs to that effect. And even though, we in the CR have given you many arguments as to why their shita makes the most sense.
You want to bring a different shita, feel free to bring a different shita, but don’t bash those that presented the other shita and don’t ignore the arguments of those who agree with it and keep insisting that they are wrong.
Thank you for listening.