Reply To: abuse

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee abuse Reply To: abuse

#1200732
Ex-CTLawyer
Participant

Ash……………

It’s obvious you did not read and follow my post:

#1 have child checked by doctor and the doctor will report abuse if there is merit to the child’s version of the events.

After #4 I write:

“The above all assumes the action is true and that the child did not strike the adult first and he was forcibly removed in an act of self-defense.”

How dare you say I suggest punitive legal action without finding out the teacher’s version of the events?

Before you make accusations, make sure you read every word in a post, understand and digest them. Attorneys choose their words very carefully, even when posting under a nom de plum on social media sites such as the coffee room. I never suggested legal action without making sure the child’s version was accurate and that unwanted and unauthorized physical contact by a school employee occurred.

No information was given in the original post as to the jurisdiction where this occurred (or that it was made up). I regularly post that my legal opinions are as the law applies in CT. As posted, the school employee would be guilty of common law battery…’the unwanted and illegal touching of another’ In most states in the USA, corporal punishment by school employees of students is not legal.

BTW>>>The school principal I mentioned from a big city in CT had her appeal thrown out by a CT Appeals Court today, it had already been decided against her by a Federal judge when she claimed she was disciplined because she was Black. The abused children were also Black.