Let’s imagine that some of the liberal doublespeak “allegations” (i.e., name-calling) applied to Clinton, as well. For example:
Fraud: the Clinton Foundation
Immorality: Monica (yes I’m aware that it involved Bill but she was an accomplice), late-term abortions
Phony: Kissing Suha and then saying there was a mis-translation
Fake: Bengazi, email scandal
But, then, all of this is really irrelevant because irrational people can rationalize any and all evil, e.g.,
“I have a realistic expectation of politicians especially when it comes to Foreign policy. Its called Realpolitik and it is the foundation of understanding Political Science since the days of Bismarck. You should read up on it sometime. So I understand (but abhor) how someone could kiss Suha Arafat and take money for her foundation from Gulf states. I look to the bottom line of where her development and implementation of realistic policy was, and it was not objectively anti-Israel”
I hope you take great pride in your tolerance for pay-for-play Palestinian-loving criminals – maybe you could extend that tolerance toward Health just a bit – after all, it’s not as though he’s rioting.