Ubiq -“”BTW for the sake of reality
Section 701J was ammended by Congress in 1972 (not by the court as you indicated at one point)
Earlier I wasnt sure when this amendment was added and conceded that it wasnt present in the original law passed in 1964
You eventually agreed that regardless when added it was present when your alleged case took place. so this doesnt really change anything
here it is again:
You really don’t know the meaning of reality! Finally at the end you admitted that you don’t know anything about the discrimination law! The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!
Next time, remind me, when I see one your SN’s to stay far away.
That’s right you don’t know anything, except molecule and macromolecule!
“apologies for raising the intellectualness of this thread ever so slightly”
Don’t worry, you could not possibly raise any intellect on this thread, because from the beginning to your very last post you have demonstrated that your knowledge about every subject (except macromolecule) is so minimal, it’s pathetic!!!