Ubiq -“That’s what I’m telling you – you don’t!”
So educate me. Please”
I don’t have the time or energy to teach you law!
“If was that simple, I’d definitely post it; it’s not!”
Ah so your example was flawed! Anyway give it a shot. Your a great explainer and I’m a pretty good understander. Dont sell your self short”
See above!
“It does exist, despite your denial!”
Heres what confuses me, earlier you indicated you were ok with us finding it (you encouraged me and others to searhc for it) but didnt want to post the name. If it was a real case I would have found it (and known your name I guess) which you said you were ok with. So why play this game? Just provide the name of the case or search terms that will turn it up? OR say I dont want you to find the case because I wont to be private. Which is fine too. but why this weird middle game?”
Like I wrote previously, I’m not going to post my name. If you figure it out, I really don’t care!
“This is what I posted – “I wrote they’re Antisemitic because they didn’t follow their own definition in my court case!””
“Its been a long thread youve posted all sorts of contradictory staments
eg:
“I happen not to have a problem with that interpretation, but what I just posted was to make a point”
I thought you were an English professor! That wasn’t a contradiction!
I’ll explain it to you again – I don’t have a problem the way they interpreted “undue hardship”. My problem is that they didn’t follow that interpretation in my court case!