Ubiq -“You kept insisting they do. You are wrong.”
Never! All I said was there rulings are put into the law, ie. US Code!
“They determine what undyear hardship means. Not you.
You kept saying what gives them the right, they need you changed to “moral rught” (not sure what that means in this setting, you never clarified when asked)”
Stop changing what I wrote! What I’ve posted previously is that what gives them the right (ie. Moral right) to severely restrict the employment discrimination law?!?
“You’ve confusesdone yourself so much, you don’t know what youreally own opinio was.”
Wrong again!!!
“These where the 2 points we were most recently discussing;
a the supreme court does not ammend the law
b this law had already been ammended before the ruling”
“I’d be happy to point out where u incorrectly disputed the two above points”
Why don’t you first explain what you mean by a & b? Then we can discuss it. Maybe I’ll disagree or maybe not!
We seem to not be able to get each other’s points across!