Ubiq -“What do you mean by start up? shoot some nukes?”
That’s exactly right! Don’t assume he’ll be shooting nukes at anyone he doesn’t like. Stop threatening e/o with scare tactics!
“But Trump’s daughter was willing to become Jewish, in order that her husband didn’t have to assimilate!”
“So trump is now your example of promoting multiculturalism?”
Much more than the Clintons with their Jewish son in law!
They would never consider letting their daughter become Jewish!
“you couldnt be more wrong. That is PRECISELY the job of the courts in general, and the supreme court in particular. Nmaely to interpret the law.
See Article 2 of the US constitution. You say misinterpret, though a. you indicated at one point that you couldnt list such an example. b. misinterpret is obviously subjective. and c. in a sense it is their job to “misinterpret” sicne by interpreting the law (ie doing their job) they will sometimes get it wrong in your opinion.
that IS very kind of you to back up your baseless statements with examples. However I cant find where youve provided your example. would you mind linking to the post where you provided said example of where”
From EEOC website:
“Title VII prohibits:
Courts have No right to change the basic meaning of the law!
Even if they have the right to interpret the law!
Again -“They changed the meaning of “Religious accommodation”!
The law says employers’ must do Religious accommodation. Ask any normal English teacher and they would translate that to mean not too hard on the employer or not extremely hard on the employer or even no matter what.
Saying it means “not more than de minimis cost or burden on business operations;” is changing the basic meaning of the law!!!!
They got away with this, just like in Germany – they got away with the Nuremberg laws!!!!