(PAA:)
Re:
“Facetious”
(Randomex)
___________
“I think this is facetious…”
(Randomex)
___________
It would certainly not be the first time you’d be
using an argument that contravenes common sense
despite being logical.
(Randomex)
What I meant was that I didn’t think PAA actually thought the
arguments I was talking about were valid, but wrote them anyway
as a joke/troll (or so I think) because he could get away with it,
seeing as they were not illogical but merely against common sense.
When I wrote >“There, I said it.”< (not included by PAA in his quote),
I meant to tell him that someone had finally caught on to this trick of his. Am I mistaken (and giving myself too much credit*), Patur?
I actually wrote that second post with the intention that it be
put on this list, and I realize now that the first ones deserved
inclusion too (I had previously objected to their use),
but I think this explanation should be here as well.
[*I mean specifically about this – I’m sure I do in general. 🙂 ]