Earning money by causing killing for the pleasure of killing is just as bad!
When it says for pasnasa, it means for food or fur so people dont starve and freeze.
It is? Why is it different than earning money from killing for the sake of earning money?
I’m not following your logic. The guides need the money so that they and their kids don’t starve and freeze.
What point is being made anyhow – that the animal rights activists are wrong, and we’ll prove it by acting cruelly to animals?
That wasn’t what I was thinking. I was thinking that society would be accustomed to the idea that human needs come before animal needs.