The reason we don’t is because we don’t, but if we did, we would.
That’s how liberals see the world. Start everything from first principles and if you don’t know why something is, just destroy it.
It’s now how I see the world. Sometimes we don’t know why we started doing something, but the fact that it’s widely accepted indicates there must have been a good reason it was started in the first place.
I’m not all that familiar with the ads, but 1) I probably see nuance where others don’t. 2) PR is PR. If the ad were worded the way you wanted, it would probably be humorously weak, and wouldn’t accomplish anything.
Yes, that’s right. Because the nuanced argument actually is humorously weak.