Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › changing neighborhoods and anti-semitism › Reply To: changing neighborhoods and anti-semitism
joseph
Nope you are wrong. for example in the Tenafly case the court ruled (as I recall) that if they banned ALL postings etc attached to utility poles then they can prevent the Eruv.
Now obviously if after years of allowing postings on utility poles, when an eruv was to be built they suddenly institute a ban, even if constitutionally sound we both know the intent. However it may in fact be constitutional, however its still wrong
With enough creativity it can be done.
Which brings me back to my question.
Would you mind answering?
Anyway even if hypothetical. since when are you averse to hypothetical questions
A hypothetical question can be answered