PAA: So you admit that you’re just putting words into a posek’s mouth: “he said it by one mechanism for igun-prevention, so it must apply to a different mechanism as well.” Unconvincing.
I am not putting any words into anyone’s mouth. I don’t think you read the link. It is clear that R’ Levinson was not objecting to any specific mechanism of igun-prevention. He was objecting to the very idea of bringing up igun-prevention at a wedding. The prenup is igun-prevention. Hence, the objection against discussing igun-prevention would stand against it. If you have a chiluk, I would be happy to hear it. But I don’t see why you think I am making crazy assumptions here.