Reply To: Shmuly Yanklowitz, Novominsker and OO theology

Home Forums Controversial Topics Shmuly Yanklowitz, Novominsker and OO theology Reply To: Shmuly Yanklowitz, Novominsker and OO theology

#1095159
Patur Aval Assur
Participant

DaasYochid:

Let’s be absolutely clear using the example of corporeality:

1)Can it be definitively proven whether H’ has a corporeal manifestation or not?

2)If yes then the following is irrelevant

3)If no, then if for example H’ had a corporeal manifestation and then the “accepted psak” was that he does not have a corporeal manifestation, does H’s existence actually change?

4)If yes (to #3) then theoretically every Sanhedrin can pasken one way or the other so H’ is constantly changing his existence – this sounds kind of weird to say the least

4)If no, then how can you believe be’emuna sheleima one way or the other?