Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Theological Conundrum (read at your own risk) › Reply To: Theological Conundrum (read at your own risk)
My previous post was submitted before PAAs was approved. Oh well.
DaasYochid – I just realised that I was talking about something very different to you. You were talking about an inherent Right and Wrong, I was discussing an innate sensitivity to which is what. I am currently not sure what PAAs position is – whether he holds nothing is essentially Right (like you understood) or that you don’t have an innate reasoning to determine what is Right and what is Wrong.
You hold the mitzvos aren’t random. Are you saying they are essentially Right even without the Mitzvos? If HKB”H wouldn’t have told us to shake Lulav, would it still be the ‘right thing to do’? Or is it only Right as a consequence of the commandment? (I haven’t got time to discuss my view, but I’d like to know what you meant)