The issue seems less about force or coercion than about condescension.
The person giving away his possessions is behaving offensively as the self-appointed spiritual guide of the recipient. It’s as though his “charity” puts him on a higher spiritual plane than “his” beneficiary.
He has essentially “bought” himself a pulpit with housewares and is now lecturing his hapless congregant.
To be truly charitable, perhaps one should make such “donations” anonymously and not learn the identity of the recipients.