Also, #1 of mine is easily significant enough on its own to debunk the simplistic math. The quoted figure is 105 males born to 100 females consistently. That’s a 5% disparity per year my friend. In order for population growth to render that insignificant you would need to prove a growth rate a few percent higher. Suppose you said 8% for a net excess of 3% girls. You would have to believe our population doubles every 9 years to argue that. Preposturous.
Menu