So you know Syag to not be a charlatan or meshuggener but you have your doubts about me. But I suspect that the (one of many) reason(s) why you would suspect me of being a charlatan or a meshuggener is precisely because of techeiles(ology).
Wrong on both counts. If Syag (or for that matter you) would say she can tell a lot about me based on my techeiles, I would think she (or you) was badly mistaken, maybe even a fraud. (Or I would do mental gymnastics to figure out how I misunderstood the claim.)
Until that point, I think she (and you) are not.
I do not think graphology falls into the category of automatic fraud/meshuggener.
And Syag has enough credibility (and sanity) that even if most people who claim proficiency in graphology are lying, I would believe her. (I would probably believe you as well, but I’ve “known” Syag for longer, so I feel more confident, in her case, to apply my skill in coffeeroompostology). For the most part, though, I’m not making a distinction between you and her, I’m making the distinction between the types of claim.
I’m trying to be dan you l’kaf z’chus, but on the off chance that you are implying any sort of dishonesty on Syag’s part, I hereby strongly protest.